LATAM mining exporters must prove 3TG minerals are conflict-free or risk losing US and EU buyers.

SEC Rule 13p-1 and OECD due diligence requirements are non-negotiable for tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold exporters. Coppermont provides a step-by-step compliance process to secure your supply chain.

Conflict minerals compliance is a critical regulatory requirement for mining exporters in Latin America who supply tin, tantalum, tungsten, or gold (3TG) to US or global markets. These minerals are essential in electronics, aerospace, and automotive industries, but their extraction in conflict-affected regions has raised human rights and trade concerns. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 13p-1, enacted under the Dodd-Frank Act, mandates that publicly traded companies disclose whether their products contain conflict minerals sourced from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or adjoining countries. While the rule directly applies to reporting issuers, it creates downstream obligations for all suppliers in the supply chain, including LATAM exporters. Understanding this compliance framework is essential for maintaining access to US buyers and avoiding reputational damage.

Who Needs Conflict Minerals Compliance and Why It Matters

Any mining exporter in Latin America that produces or processes 3TG minerals and sells to US-listed companies or their suppliers must comply with conflict minerals due diligence requirements. This includes mines in Peru, Chile, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, and other countries where gold, tin, tantalum, and tungsten are extracted. Even if your operation is far from conflict zones, US importers and manufacturers require proof that your supply chain is free from ties to armed groups. Compliance is not optional—it is a precondition for doing business with many Fortune 500 firms and defense contractors. Failure to provide adequate documentation can result in lost contracts, customs delays, and exclusion from key markets.

Understanding the Regulatory Framework

Conflict minerals compliance is governed by multiple overlapping standards. The SEC Rule 13p-1 requires companies to file Form SD with the SEC, detailing their conflict minerals sourcing. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas provides a five-step framework for due diligence. Additionally, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) offers audit programs like the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP) to certify smelters and refiners. For LATAM exporters, alignment with these standards is often demanded by buyers. The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) may also scrutinize shipments for compliance under broader trade enforcement actions.

Step-by-Step Compliance Process for LATAM Exporters

First, establish a conflict minerals policy that commits to responsible sourcing and aligns with OECD guidance. This policy should be communicated to all employees, suppliers, and customers. Second, conduct a supply chain mapping exercise to identify all smelters and refiners in your mineral processing chain. Use the RMI’s Smelter Database to check if your downstream partners are certified. Third, perform a reasonable country of origin inquiry (RCOI) to determine whether your minerals originate from the DRC or adjoining countries. Fourth, if necessary, conduct enhanced due diligence using the OECD framework, including on-the-ground assessments and third-party audits. Fifth, prepare and submit an annual conflict minerals report to your direct customers, or if you are a publicly traded company, file Form SD with the SEC. Maintain records for at least five years.

Timelines and Costs for Compliance

Developing a conflict minerals compliance program typically takes three to six months for initial setup, depending on the complexity of your supply chain. Costs vary widely: a basic RCOI and policy development can range from $5,000 to $15,000 for small exporters, while full due diligence with third-party audits may cost $20,000 to $50,000 annually. Smelter certification through RMAP involves additional fees and audit expenses. Ongoing compliance requires dedicated staff time—often one to two employees part-time—or outsourcing to compliance consultants. Delays in certification can lead to shipment holds, so start early. Many LATAM exporters underestimate the time needed to trace minerals back to the mine and secure smelter documentation.

Common Mistakes That Delay Clearance

One frequent error is assuming that because your mine is not in a conflict zone, you are exempt. The SEC rule applies to all 3TG minerals regardless of origin unless you can prove they are DRC conflict-free. Another mistake is failing to update due diligence annually—regulations and buyer requirements evolve. Incomplete or inaccurate supply chain mapping is also common; exporters often lack visibility beyond the first tier of their supply chain. Using generic declarations instead of smelter-level data can lead to rejection by US importers. Additionally, neglecting to train staff on compliance procedures can result in inconsistent reporting. Finally, some exporters try to handle compliance alone without legal or trade advisory support, which increases risk of non-compliance.

Regional Variations and Buyer Expectations

Buyers in different markets may have varying requirements. US customers typically demand full SEC and OECD compliance, while European buyers under the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation (effective 2021) require similar but not identical due diligence. For LATAM exporters, the EU regulation is increasingly relevant as trade diversifies. Some buyers, especially in the technology and defense sectors, require RMAP certification for all smelters in the supply chain. Others accept alternative audit programs like the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) Responsible Gold Guidance for gold. Exporters should clarify specific buyer expectations in contracts and consider obtaining independent certification to streamline sales. Brazil and Chile have also developed national responsible mining initiatives that complement international standards.

How Coppermont Can Support Your Compliance Journey

Navigating conflict minerals compliance across US, EU, and LATAM regulations requires specialized knowledge of trade law, supply chain auditing, and regional mining practices. Coppermont’s regulatory and compliance team assists LATAM mining exporters in developing due diligence programs, conducting supply chain mapping, and preparing documentation for US and international buyers. We work directly with your operations to identify smelters, draft policies, and coordinate with certification bodies like the RMI. Our advisors also provide training for your staff and help negotiate compliance clauses with buyers. Whether you are a small artisanal mine or a large industrial exporter, we can tailor a compliance roadmap that meets regulatory requirements while protecting your market access. Contact a Coppermont trade advisor today to discuss your conflict minerals compliance needs and ensure your exports are ready for global scrutiny.

Get Started with Coppermont

Talk to a Trade Advisor

Weighing this market or sourcing decision?

Coppermont works with a small number of clients at a time on exactly this kind of market entry and sourcing question. If it is relevant to what you are evaluating, we would welcome a conversation.

Talk to an advisor